'Safety'

HR Update- Drunk and Disorderly

Monday, July 14th, 2008

Drunk and Disorderly–Do You Have to Accommodate Alcoholism?

(We received this great article about Alcohol on the job today from HR Today- we hope you find it helpful and informative….)

By government estimates, nearly 14 million Americans abuse alcohol or are alcoholic, and millions more are close to being so. That means, odds are, some of them are working for you.

Fortunately, with support and treatment, many people are able to stop drinking and rebuild their lives. But how much does the company have to help?

What is alcoholism?
Alcoholism is a disease marked by these symptoms:
–Craving (a strong need or compulsion to drink),
–Loss of control (the inability to limit one’s drinking),
–Physical dependence (withdrawal symptoms such as nausea, sweating, shakiness, and anxiety occuring when alcohol use is stopped after a period of heavy drinking), and
–Tolerance (the need to drink greater amounts of alcohol in order to “get high”).

Is alcoholism a disability under the ADA?
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not contain a list of medical conditions that constitute disabilities. Instead, the ADA says a person has a disability if he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alcoholism is an impairment. Therefore, people with alcoholism who are substantially limited in a major life activity will have a disability under the ADA.

However, even if a person with alcoholism meets the definition of disability, an employer may discipline, discharge, or deny employment to an alcoholic whose current use of alcohol adversely affects job performance or conduct to the extent that he or she is not “qualified,” or if the person’s presence creates an “undue hardship” for the employer.

Does an employer have to allow use of alcohol at work as an accommodation?
No. The ADA specifically provides that an employer may prohibit the use of alcohol in the workplace and require that employees not be under the influence of alcohol.

Are tests for alcohol use considered medical tests under the ADA? Yes. Blood, urine, and breath analyses to check for alcohol use are considered medical exams and, therefore, are subject to ADA limitations. According to the EEOC, an employer’s ability to make disability-related inquiries or require medical examinations is analyzed in three stages: pre-offer, post-offer, and employment.

Pre-offer, the ADA prohibits all disability-related inquiries and medical examinations, even if they are related to the job.

Post-offer (after an applicant is given a conditional job offer, but before he or she starts work), an employer may make disability-related inquiries and conduct medical examinations, regardless of whether they are related to the job, as long as it does so for all entering employees in the same job category.

After employment begins, an employer may make disability-related inquiries and require medical examinations only if they are job-related and consistent with business necessity.

May an employer test an employee who has been off from work in an alcohol rehabilitation program?
Yes, according to the EEOC, but only if the employer has a reasonable belief, based on objective evidence, that the employee will pose a direct threat in the absence of periodic testing. (Employers also may conduct periodic alcohol testing pursuant to “last chance” agreements.)

The determination of “reasonable belief of direct threat” requires individualized assessment of the employee and his or her position and cannot be based on general assumptions. One example might be a bus driver with only a few months’ experience who returns to work after 4 months of rehabilitation and counseling.

Given the safety risks associated with the bus driver’s position, his short period of employment, and recent completion of rehabilitation, the employer can likely show that it would be job-related and consistent with business necessity to subject the driver to frequent periodic alcohol tests.

However, take the same situation except that the worker is clerical. Now it is not likely that the employee poses a direct threat, so the employer probably cannot show that periodic alcohol testing would be job-related and consistent with business necessity.

This article offers good advice, but as you can see the answers to drug and alcohol testing and the ADA are not always cut and dried. For this reason it’s a good idea to contact your HR Advisor at A Plus Benefits before conducting any non-accident drug and alcohol testing.

Thanks for reading our blog.
Randall Barker SPHE CELS, is the VP of Human Resources for A Plus Benefits, Inc.

1 in 12 US Workers Use Illegal Drugs

Friday, July 20th, 2007

A USA Today article from Monday of this week stated that one in twelve full-time workers in the United States admitted to using illegal drugs in the past month. The highest rates of drug use were reported among younger workers and those in the restaurant and construction industries. The survey found that most of the illegal drug use was marijuana.


These numbers are alarming and speak to the importance of having an employee policy prohibiting the use of alcohol and drugs in the workplace. When your employees are using drugs and alcohol they are endangering themselves, their co-workers and your business.


All employees of A Plus Benefits and its clients are subject to an alcohol and drug safety policy that outlines when drug testing will occur and what happens in the event of a positive drug test. If you would like more information on creating a drug and alcohol policy for your business, please let us know.

Samantha Bushard is an HR employee for the Idaho office of A Plus Benefits, Inc.

Top 10 OSHA Citations

Thursday, July 12th, 2007

According to www.OSHA.gov the Top 10 listing of OSHA’s most frequently cited standards are:

Scaffolding
Standard 1926.451
This standard covers the generally safety requirements for the construction, maintenance and use of scaffolding. Basically, employers must protect workers from falls and falling objects while working on or near scaffolding at heights of 10 feet or more.

1926.451(g)(1) Failure to provide fall protection.
1926.451(e)(1) Failure to provide proper access.
1926.451(b)(1) Failure to ensure adequate platform construction.
1926.451(g)(1)(vii) Lack of personal fall arrest or guardrail systems.
1926.451©(2) Failure to properly support scaffolding.

Hazard Communication
Standard 1910.1200
This standard addresses the hazards of chemicals, both chemicals produced in the workplace and those imported into the workplace. It also governs the communication of those hazards to workers.1910.1200(e)(1) Failure to develop and maintain a written program.

1910.1200(h)(1) Failure to maintain training.
1910.1200(h) Lack of employee training.
1910.1200(g)(1) Failure to have a Material Safety Data Sheets for each chemical.
1910.1200(f)(5)(i) Failure to label each container with the identity of the chemical within.

Fall Protection
Standard 1926.501
This standard tells workers and employers where fall protection is required, which fall protection systems are appropriate for given situations, the proper construction and installation of safety systems, and the proper supervision of employees to prevent falls. The standard is designed to protect construction personnel working above 6 feet.

Every year OSHA issues thousands of citations to companies that supply inadequate safety training to their employees. Although the majority of OSHA standards do not call for safety training, you can be cited for violating almost any standard if your employees aren’t trained.For example, your employees might be required to wear respirators before entering a restricted area where cadmium exposure is high. But if they don’t choose the correct respirator, or if they don’t know how to conduct fit tests, you’ll be cited for violating the cadmium standard. What led to the citation? Lack of training.This scenario can be adapted to virtually every OSHA standard. Training is always an essential element of compliance. Without it, you will face fines. On a broader spectrum, training is often the key to maintaining a safe workplace because employee’s attitudes can often mean the difference between safety and tragedy. After all, no safety program or equipment will be of any use unless employees commit themselves to working safely, using the appropriate personal protective equipment as instructed, and following safe work procedures.

This makes your training program vital. When training is thorough, complete, and correct, it contributes to everyone’s safety. When it falls short, the results can be tragic.

Safety training should be one of your top priorities. Through education and training, you can teach workers to stay safe, and you can stay in compliance with OSHA’s training requirements. To achieve both of these very important goals, take the following approach to safety training:

Know When To Train

As soon as workers are hired, be sure to familiarize them with your company’s philosophy toward safety. You should use training to instill the right attitude in your new workers. You want them to take the issue of safety seriously and to make the commitment to following the safety rules. Then provide specific training to address the particular hazards they will face on the job. In addition, update company training material, equipment, or work procedures whenever there is a change. Finally, provide training updates as often as the OSHA standards require.

Know What To Cover
It’s crucial to provide training that is mandated by the OSHA standards. If you don’t, workers could become injured or ill and you could be fined. In all, there are 75 standards that require you to train workers in specific hazards. So take a good look at the standards and insure you cover the required topics.

Required Training by OSHA Regulation
You have a general duty to teach your employees how to do their jobs safely. OSHA mandates training in a number of its standards. And there’s always the chance that your training program did not adequately cover the mandates. If applicable to your operations the following tasks must include formal, initial and annual refresher training.

1. 1910.38 Evacuation Plans
2. 1910.66 Powered Platforms
3. 1910.134 Open Surface Tanks
4. 1910.95 Hearing Protection
5. 1910.96 Ionizing Radiation
6. 1910.106 Flammable/Combustible Liquids
7. 1910.109 Explosives
8. 1910.1200 Hazardous Materials
9. 1910.110 Liquefied Petroleum Gases.
10. 1910.120 Hazardous Waste and
11. 1910.134 Respiratory Protection
12. 1910.147 Lockout/tagout
13. 1910.151 Medical Services and First Aid
14. 1910.155 Fire Protection
15. 1910.177 Material Handling and Storage
16. 1910.178 Powered Industrial Trucks
17. 1910.179 Overhead and Gantry Cranes
18. 1910.217 Machine Guards
19. 1910.253 Welding and Cutting Procedures
20. Subpart Z Toxic and Hazardous Substances
21. 1910.1200 Hazard Communication

Be Thorough
To make each of your training programs as thorough and effective as possible, A Plus Benefits can provide Job Hazard Analysis, Safety Policies, Written Training Programs, Videos, Hands on Training, and the list continues. One simple call to our safety director can be the answer to your training needs.

In summary, take your safety training obligations very seriously, after all, Utah OSHA does. Utah OSHA and your workers are counting on you to provide thorough education and training. If you fulfill this requirement, you’ll be rewarded with fewer injuries, illnesses, OSHA citations, and LOWER WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COSTS!!!Rick Scott is the Safety Director for A Plus Benefits, Inc.

What is an Emergency Action Plan?

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

An emergency action plan describes the actions employees should take to ensure their safety if a fire or other emergency situation occurs. Well-developed emergency plans and proper employee training (such that employees understand their roles and responsibilities within the plan) will result in fewer and less severe employee injuries and less structural damage to the facility during emergencies. A poorly prepared plan, likely will lead to a disorganized evacuation or emergency response, resulting in confusion, injury, and property damage.

Putting together a comprehensive emergency plan that deals with those issues specific to our worksite is not difficult. It involves taking what was learned from your workplace evaluation and describing how employees will respond to different types of emergencies, taking into account your specific worksite layout, structural features, and emergency systems. Most organizations find it better to include a diverse group of representatives (management and employees) in the planning procedure to meet frequently to review progress and allocate development tasks. The commitment and support of all employees is critical to the plan’s success in the event of an emergency; ask for their help in establishing and implementing your emergency action plan.

What should an emergency action plan contain?

How do I develop an emergency action plan?

What are the essential evacuation elements?

In some instances, is it better to shelter in place?

How are portable fire extinguishers integrated into the emergency action plan?

How are fire, rescue and medical services arranged?

What are the options for reporting an emergency and alerting employees?

Your planning process and site-specific emergency plan should address each of the following elements:

· Preferred procedures for reporting emergencies such as dialing 911, or an internal emergency number, or pulling a manual fire alarm.

· A description of the alarm system to be used to notify employees (including disabled employees) to evacuate and/or take other actions. The alarms used for different actions should be distinctive and might include horn blasts, sirens, or even public address systems.

· An evacuation policy, procedures, and escape route assignments so employees understand who is authorized to order an evacuation, under what conditions an evacuation would be necessary, how to evacuate, and what routes to take.

· Procedures for employees who remain on site after the evacuation alarm sounds, if required before evacuating. Employees may be required to operate fire extinguishers or shut down electrical equipment.

· Procedures to account for employees after the evacuation to ensure that everyone got out might include procedures for designated employees to sweep areas, checking offices and securing rooms, before being the last to leave a workplace or conducting a roll call in the assembly. Many employers designate an “evacuation warder” to assist others in an evacuation and to account for personnel.

· The duties, responsibilities, and names of employees assigned with rescue and medical tasks. Most small organizations rely on local public resources such as the local fire department.

· A description of how employees will be informed on the contents of the plan and trained in roles and responsibilities.

· The names, titles, departments, and phone numbers of employees who be contacted for additional information or clarification of some aspect of the plan.

· A list of key personnel who should be contacted during off hours emergencies.

· The site of an alternative communication center to be used in the event of a fire or explosion.

· A secure on-off site location to store originals or duplicate copies of accounting record, documents, your employee’s emergency contact lists, and other essential records.

· Effective plans often call for retraining employees annual and include drills in which employees practice evacuating their workplace

· And gathering in the assembly area.

How do I develop an Emergency Action Plan?

It is essential that the emergency plan developed be site specific with respect to emergency conditions evaluated, evacuation policies and procedures, emergency reporting mechanisms, and alarm systems. To assist you in your planning, a series of checklist have been provided that identify is that that must be considered when drafting a comprehensive emergency action plan. Contact Rick Scott at A Plus Benefits to obtain this checklist.

Rick Scott is the Safety Director for A Plus Benefits, Inc.

Preventing Unsafe Acts

Monday, July 2nd, 2007

In today’s work environment, employees are protected by a variety of safety laws, rules, and regulations and of course, concerned employers. Safety is just good business and it requires a team effort and responsibility by all employees.

Safety Professionals have always relied upon three essentials, called the three E’s. Education, Engineering and Enforcement.

Education means training, explaining the proper procedures of job responsibilities, safety rules and of course, constant awareness for working and acting safely.

Engineering is finding safety hazards and correcting them before they contribute to an accident. Engineering also includes proper selection of equipment and facilities. Engineering focuses primarily on physical hazards in the workplace, but can also include job safety analysis, ergonomics and other safety engineering functions.

The third E is enforcement of safety rules. It doesn’t do any good to have rules if they aren’t enforced. This message addresses the enforcement of safety rules.

Insurance companies and governmental agencies have compiled accident statistics from all industries over the years. The results of analyzing hundreds of accidents reveal 85 to 98 percent of all accidents causes from the unsafe acts of employees. There may be more than one cause of an accident, but most accidents are caused, in whole or in part, by the unsafe acts of employees.

Does this mean employees intentionally hurt themselves, or they don’t care, or that they’re irresponsible? No!

Quite often, it’s the hard working, dedicated, loyal employee, who gets busy and tries to take a short cut, or simply isn’t thinking about safety and contributes to the accident cause.

Remember, we’re speaking about great employees, people wanting to do a good job and certainly people who want to be accident free.

What is an unsafe act?An unsafe act is any personal characteristic or condition that may cause or influence an employee to act unsafely. The conditions may be mental, emotional or physical. Some of the types of unsafe acts could be: unaware of the job hazard, inattention to job hazards, low level of job skill or inadequately trained for a specific job. It could be the employee tried to avoid extra effort or tried to gain or save time by taking a shortcut

A slip and fall is an unsafe act because the employee could have prevented the slip and fall if he or she had been paying attention to walking surface. Attention to the walking surface can prevent slips and falls even if the floor is uneven, slippery, wet or has a physical hazard, such as a hole or torn carpet.

Certainly the unsafe condition of the floor should be corrected, but that’s not a reason to slip and fall. Inattention to walking surface contributed to the accident.

Let’s move on to the enforcement of safety rules and what happens when you experience an accident or injury as a result of an unsafe act. Enforcement of safety rules has always been management’s responsibility. Management is required to investigate accidents and take corrective action to prevent similar accidents. NOTE: Just filling out an accident report and sending to A Plus is not an investigation. It’s a little more complicated than that. Management is legally required to enforce safety rules. For a safety program to be judged effective, there are several elements or tests the program must pass.

1. Does the company have written safety rules and procedures?

2. Are employees advised of these rules through education and training?
3. Is the training documented? Documentation includes what information was taught, when it was taught and who provided the training.
4. Are safety hazards identified and corrected. This is why routine safety inspections are necessary and action taken to correct identified deficiencies.
5. Are safety rules enforced? If yes, management must prove this with documentation. That’s what we want to talk about now.


How do you document that rules are enforced? When an employee causes an accident or injury through an unsafe act, the employee must be told what he or she did wrong and management must explain how to correct the unsafe behavior. We call it Safety Counseling.

It’s not disciplinary action; the employee isn’t being called on the carpet to face a chewing out. It’s a requirement for management to explain what type of behavior or unsafe act caused the accident. An employee can’t be expected to correct something without knowing what it is that needs correcting. After explaining the unsafe act, management is obligated to explain how to correct the deficiency.

If it’s a back injury, perhaps additional training in the safe lifting technique is needed. Or, an engineering study needs to be conducted to determine if equipment is needed.

Safety is serious business and all employees must accept responsibility for working and acting safely.

That brings us to the question of what about the accident-prone employees. There really aren’t accident-prone employees; there are employees who have more injuries than others. This relates more to their attitudes, experience, training, awareness and safety behavior. Perhaps they haven’t been counseled so as to effect a change in their safety behavior.

Safety is really nothing more than preventing accidents by your personal behavior.

It’s not complicated and it certainly doesn’t take time to think safety. It’s a personal responsibility. It’s a personal responsibility when driving your car or at home or even during recreation.

Rick Scott is the Safety Director for A Plus Benefits, Inc.